.. _sample-11p25: BGS VLIM log M\ :sub:`*` ≥ 11.25, z < 0.35 — detailed systematic analysis =============================================================================== High-mass BGS VLIM sample (541,855 galaxies, z < 0.35). Shot noise dominates per-pixel statistics at both resolutions. The LRT rejects the additive null at NSIDE 64 (:math:`\lambda_{\rm LR} = 123.4`). .. contents:: On this page :local: :depth: 1 .. seealso:: :doc:`results_ls10` — summary tables and figures for all nine samples. ---- Sample statistics ----------------- .. csv-table:: :header: "Parameter", "NSIDE 32", "NSIDE 64", "NSIDE 128", "NSIDE 256" :widths: 36, 16, 16, 16, 16 "Stellar-mass threshold", "log M* ≥ 11.25", "log M* ≥ 11.25", "log M* ≥ 11.25", "log M* ≥ 11.25" "Redshift limit", "z < 0.35", "z < 0.35", "z < 0.35", "z < 0.35" "N\ :sub:`gal`", "541,855", "541,855", "541,855", "541,855" "N\ :sub:`pix` (good footprint)", "5,609", "21,555", "84,131", "325,324" "N\ :sub:`templates`", "11", "11", "11", "11" "MCMC walkers", "210", "210", "210", "210" "MCMC steps after burn-in", "1500", "1500", "1500", "1500" ---- Goodness-of-fit: :math:`\hat{\sigma}` by method and resolution ------------------------------------------------------------------ The noise parameter :math:`\hat{\sigma}` measures residual scatter after systematic subtraction — lower is better. Results are shown for NSIDE 32, 64, 128, and 256. ISD-3 is unavailable at NSIDE 128 and 256 (no partial files generated at those resolutions). .. csv-table:: :header: "Method", ":math:`\hat{\sigma}` (N32)", ":math:`\hat{\sigma}` (N64)", ":math:`\hat{\sigma}` (N128)", ":math:`\hat{\sigma}` (N256)", "Notes" :widths: 14, 12, 12, 12, 12, 38 "OLS", "0.3308", "0.3842", "0.6405", "1.2602", "closed-form least-squares" "ElasticNet", "0.3319", "0.3846", "0.6406", "1.2603", "L1+L2 regularised; 3-fold CV" "ISD-1", "0.3308", "0.3842", "0.6405", "1.2602", "iterative self-calibration; poly order 1" "ISD-3 †", "0.7031", "0.6196", "0.6454", "1.3131", "† degree-3 polynomial; unavailable at NSIDE 128/256" "MCMC-add", "0.3313", "0.3843", "0.6406", "1.2602", "MCMC additive; acc N32=0.386 N64=0.389" "MCMC-comb", "0.4062", "0.3930", "0.6329", "1.2117", "MCMC combined; acc N32=0.293 N64=0.288" † ISD-3 uses a degree-3 polynomial expansion and is ill-conditioned with correlated templates. Likelihood Ratio Test (additive vs combined model) -------------------------------------------------- .. csv-table:: :header: "Resolution", ":math:`\lambda_{\rm LR}`", "dof", "p-value", "Reject H₀" :widths: 14, 14, 8, 22, 12 "NSIDE 32", "613.5", "11", "< 10\ :sup:`-124`", "**Yes**" "NSIDE 64", "123.4", "11", "< 10\ :sup:`-21`", "**Yes**" "NSIDE 128", "140.8", "11", "< 10\ :sup:`-24`", "**Yes**" "NSIDE 256", "597.3", "11", "< 10\ :sup:`-121`", "**Yes**" MCMC acceptance fractions: NSIDE 32: add 0.386, comb 0.293 NSIDE 64: add 0.389, comb 0.288 NSIDE 128: add 0.387, comb 0.287 NSIDE 256: add 0.390, comb 0.301. Healthy range: 0.15–0.50. ---- Template amplitude ranking — additive model (MCMC-add, NSIDE 64) ------------------------------------------------------------------ All 11 templates sorted by absolute MCMC-add additive amplitude :math:`|\hat{a}_i|`. OLS shown for comparison. .. csv-table:: :header: "Rank", "Template", "NSIDE", ":math:`\hat{a}_i` (MCMC-add)", ":math:`\hat{a}_i` (OLS)", "Physical meaning" :widths: 5, 28, 6, 14, 14, 50 :stub-columns: 1 "1", "**GAIA_nstar_faint**", "64", "+0.2755", "+0.2785", "GAIA faint stellar density (photometric mis-classification of faint stars as galaxies)" "2", "**GAIA_nstar_medium**", "64", "-0.1944", "-0.1970", "GAIA medium stellar density (crowding and deblending near bright stars)" "3", "**GAIA_phot_g_mean_flux**", "64", "+0.0530", "+0.0522", "GAIA mean stellar flux in G band (scattered-light / sky-background variations)" "4", "**GAIA_phot_rp_mean_flux**", "64", "-0.0511", "-0.0504", "GAIA mean stellar flux in RP band (red scattered light)" "5", "**GAIA_phot_bp_mean_flux**", "64", "-0.0334", "-0.0331", "GAIA mean stellar flux in BP band (blue scattered light)" "6", "LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0132", "+0.0131", "LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064" "7", "LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064", "?", "-0.0079", "-0.0079", "LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064" "8", "LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0054", "+0.0054", "LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064" "9", "LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0044", "+0.0045", "LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064" "10", "LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0034", "+0.0034", "LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064" "11", "LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064", "?", "-0.0029", "-0.0028", "LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064" ---- Template amplitude ranking — multiplicative model (MCMC-comb, NSIDE 64) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- All 11 templates sorted by absolute MCMC-comb multiplicative amplitude :math:`|\hat{b}_i|`. .. csv-table:: :header: "Rank", "Template", "NSIDE", ":math:`\hat{b}_i` (MCMC-comb)", "Physical meaning" :widths: 5, 30, 6, 16, 50 :stub-columns: 1 "1", "**GAIA_nstar_faint**", "64", "+0.3944", "GAIA faint stellar density (photometric mis-classification of faint stars as galaxies)" "2", "**GAIA_nstar_medium**", "64", "-0.2422", "GAIA medium stellar density (crowding and deblending near bright stars)" "3", "**LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064**", "?", "+0.0513", "LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064" "4", "**GAIA_phot_bp_mean_flux**", "64", "-0.0343", "GAIA mean stellar flux in BP band (blue scattered light)" "5", "**GAIA_phot_g_mean_flux**", "64", "+0.0288", "GAIA mean stellar flux in G band (scattered-light / sky-background variations)" "6", "GAIA_phot_rp_mean_flux", "64", "-0.0168", "GAIA mean stellar flux in RP band (red scattered light)" "7", "LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0137", "LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064" "8", "LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0098", "LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064" "9", "LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064", "?", "-0.0063", "LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064" "10", "LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064", "?", "+0.0054", "LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064" "11", "LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064", "?", "-0.0016", "LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064" ---- Per-galaxy weight statistics (NSIDE 64) ---------------------------------------- From the ``*_NSIDE0064_WEIGHTS.fits`` file. Mean ≈ 1 and small std indicate a well-behaved weight distribution. .. csv-table:: :header: "Method", "N", "mean", "std", "p1", "p5", "p50", "p95", "p99" :widths: 14, 12, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8 "OLS", "541,855", "0.9914", "0.0352", "0.8993", "0.9443", "0.9892", "1.0495", "1.0841" "ElasticNet", "541,855", "0.9906", "0.0252", "0.9133", "0.9564", "0.9927", "1.0248", "1.0468" "ISD-1", "541,855", "0.9914", "0.0355", "0.8980", "0.9439", "0.9893", "1.0500", "1.0844" "ISD-3 †", "541,855", "1.8450", "9.0095", "0.7238", "0.8593", "0.9633", "1.2506", "5.9101" "MCMC-add", "541,855", "0.9914", "0.0352", "0.8990", "0.9445", "0.9892", "1.0493", "1.0843" "MCMC-comb", "541,855", "1.0292", "0.0470", "0.9159", "0.9462", "1.0363", "1.0932", "1.1294" ---- Systematic weight maps ---------------------- .. raw:: html
Mollweide weight maps — all six methods
Systematic weight distributions ------------------------------- Narrow peaks near 1 indicate stable weight estimates. ElasticNet weights may be exactly 1 when cross-validation selects zero amplitudes. .. raw:: htmlPer-galaxy weight distributions — all six methods
w(θ): observed vs corrected — all six methods
---- Cosmological analysis verdict ----------------------------- Sub-degree scales (:math:`\theta < 30'`): regime is **moderately contaminated** (:math:`\delta w/w \approx +2.2\%` at 30 arcmin). * Without correction: **borderline** without correction. * After correction: **suitable** after applying ``WEIGHT_COMB``. * **Large-angle warning** (:math:`\theta > 2°`): max correction 17.4% at 181 arcmin — any analysis using angular scales > 1° **must** apply ``WEIGHT_COMB``. LRT (NSIDE 64): :math:`\lambda_{\rm LR} = 123.4` (dof = 11), p = 3.7e-21 → **Reject H₀** — multiplicative contamination is statistically detected. **Recommendation**: use ``WEIGHT_COMB`` (``WEIGHT_SYS``) for all science-grade analyses.