BGS VLIM log M* ≥ 9.0, z < 0.08 — detailed systematic analysis

One of the two most contaminated BGS VLIM samples. With 523,486 galaxies at z < 0.08, faint stellar contamination dominates the systematic budget. The LRT strongly detects multiplicative contamination at both resolutions (\(\lambda_{\rm LR} = 1489.5\) at NSIDE 64).

See also

Results: systematic weights — summary tables and figures for all nine samples.


Sample statistics

Parameter

NSIDE 32

NSIDE 64

NSIDE 128

NSIDE 256

Stellar-mass threshold

log M* ≥ 9.0

log M* ≥ 9.0

log M* ≥ 9.0

log M* ≥ 9.0

Redshift limit

z < 0.08

z < 0.08

z < 0.08

z < 0.08

Ngal

523,486

523,486

523,486

523,486

Npix (good footprint)

5,612

21,563

84,367

324,258

Ntemplates

11

11

11

11

MCMC walkers

210

210

210

210

MCMC steps after burn-in

1500

1500

1500

1500


Goodness-of-fit: \(\hat{\sigma}\) by method and resolution

The noise parameter \(\hat{\sigma}\) measures residual scatter after systematic subtraction — lower is better. Results are shown for NSIDE 32, 64, 128, and 256. ISD-3 is unavailable at NSIDE 128 and 256 (no partial files generated at those resolutions).

Method

\(\hat{\sigma}\) (N32)

\(\hat{\sigma}\) (N64)

\(\hat{\sigma}\) (N128)

\(\hat{\sigma}\) (N256)

Notes

OLS

0.5474

0.6760

0.9909

1.6568

closed-form least-squares

ElasticNet

0.5491

0.6768

0.9912

1.6570

L1+L2 regularised; 3-fold CV

ISD-1

0.5474

0.6760

0.9910

1.6568

iterative self-calibration; poly order 1

ISD-3 †

2.9223

3.2810

1.4628

1.7204

† degree-3 polynomial; unavailable at NSIDE 128/256

MCMC-add

0.5483

0.6762

0.9911

1.6568

MCMC additive; acc N32=0.388 N64=0.390

MCMC-comb

0.6736

0.7511

1.0288

1.6008

MCMC combined; acc N32=0.285 N64=0.296

† ISD-3 uses a degree-3 polynomial expansion and is ill-conditioned with correlated templates.

Likelihood Ratio Test (additive vs combined model)

Resolution

\(\lambda_{\rm LR}\)

dof

p-value

Reject H₀

NSIDE 32

404.2

11

< 10-80

Yes

NSIDE 64

1489.5

11

< 10-300

Yes

NSIDE 128

3523.5

11

< 10-300

Yes

NSIDE 256

7590.4

11

< 10-300

Yes

MCMC acceptance fractions: NSIDE 32: add 0.388, comb 0.285 NSIDE 64: add 0.390, comb 0.296 NSIDE 128: add 0.388, comb 0.298 NSIDE 256: add 0.387, comb 0.310. Healthy range: 0.15–0.50.


Template amplitude ranking — additive model (MCMC-add, NSIDE 64)

All 11 templates sorted by absolute MCMC-add additive amplitude \(|\hat{a}_i|\). OLS shown for comparison.

Rank

Template

NSIDE

\(\hat{a}_i\) (MCMC-add)

\(\hat{a}_i\) (OLS)

Physical meaning

1

GAIA_nstar_faint

64

+0.4449

+0.4553

GAIA faint stellar density (photometric mis-classification of faint stars as galaxies)

2

GAIA_nstar_medium

64

-0.3143

-0.3218

GAIA medium stellar density (crowding and deblending near bright stars)

3

LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064

?

+0.0826

+0.0824

LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064

4

GAIA_phot_g_mean_flux

64

+0.0372

+0.0375

GAIA mean stellar flux in G band (scattered-light / sky-background variations)

5

GAIA_phot_rp_mean_flux

64

-0.0339

-0.0346

GAIA mean stellar flux in RP band (red scattered light)

6

LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064

?

-0.0266

-0.0264

LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064

7

GAIA_phot_bp_mean_flux

64

-0.0246

-0.0245

GAIA mean stellar flux in BP band (blue scattered light)

8

LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064

?

-0.0211

-0.0208

LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064

9

LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064

?

-0.0086

-0.0088

LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064

10

LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064

?

-0.0040

-0.0037

LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064

11

LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064

?

+0.0002

+0.0001

LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064


Template amplitude ranking — multiplicative model (MCMC-comb, NSIDE 64)

All 11 templates sorted by absolute MCMC-comb multiplicative amplitude \(|\hat{b}_i|\).

Rank

Template

NSIDE

\(\hat{b}_i\) (MCMC-comb)

Physical meaning

1

GAIA_nstar_faint

64

+1.1908

GAIA faint stellar density (photometric mis-classification of faint stars as galaxies)

2

GAIA_nstar_medium

64

-0.6523

GAIA medium stellar density (crowding and deblending near bright stars)

3

LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064

?

+0.1162

LS10_GALDEPTH_R_NSIDE_0064

4

LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064

?

+0.0850

LS10_GALDEPTH_Z_NSIDE_0064

5

GAIA_phot_rp_mean_flux

64

-0.0428

GAIA mean stellar flux in RP band (red scattered light)

6

GAIA_phot_g_mean_flux

64

+0.0280

GAIA mean stellar flux in G band (scattered-light / sky-background variations)

7

LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064

?

+0.0194

LS10_PSFSIZE_R_NSIDE_0064

8

LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064

?

-0.0181

LS10_GALDEPTH_G_NSIDE_0064

9

LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064

?

-0.0147

LS10_NOBS_R_NSIDE_0064

10

LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064

?

+0.0069

LS10_EBV_NSIDE_0064

11

GAIA_phot_bp_mean_flux

64

-0.0060

GAIA mean stellar flux in BP band (blue scattered light)


Per-galaxy weight statistics (NSIDE 64)

From the *_NSIDE0064_WEIGHTS.fits file. Mean ≈ 1 and small std indicate a well-behaved weight distribution.

Method

N

mean

std

p1

p5

p50

p95

p99

OLS

523,486

0.9982

0.0784

0.7017

0.8990

1.0014

1.1066

1.1536

ElasticNet

523,486

0.9940

0.0617

0.7431

0.9109

1.0098

1.0656

1.0803

ISD-1

523,486

0.9977

0.0764

0.7209

0.8996

1.0000

1.1073

1.1534

ISD-3 †

523,486

5.3726

20.1056

0.2569

0.4193

0.7584

9.5656

100.0000

MCMC-add

523,486

0.9980

0.0782

0.7014

0.8990

1.0014

1.1056

1.1526

MCMC-comb

523,486

1.1465

0.1532

0.5996

0.8654

1.1828

1.3321

1.4106


Systematic weight maps

Mollweide weight maps — all six methods

weight maps NSIDE 32 weight maps
NSIDE 32 weight maps
weight maps NSIDE 64 weight maps
NSIDE 64 weight maps
weight maps NSIDE 128 weight maps
NSIDE 128 weight maps
weight maps NSIDE 256 weight maps
NSIDE 256 weight maps

Systematic weight distributions

Narrow peaks near 1 indicate stable weight estimates. ElasticNet weights may be exactly 1 when cross-validation selects zero amplitudes.

Per-galaxy weight distributions — all six methods

weight distributions NSIDE 32 weight distributions
NSIDE 32 weight distributions
weight distributions NSIDE 64 weight distributions
NSIDE 64 weight distributions
weight distributions NSIDE 128 weight distributions
NSIDE 128 weight distributions
weight distributions NSIDE 256 weight distributions
NSIDE 256 weight distributions

Angular clustering w(θ) before and after correction

Each panel shows the observed angular two-point correlation function (solid black) and the corrected \(w(\theta)\) for all six methods. A well-corrected sample shows suppressed excess clustering at all scales. Each panel corresponds to one map resolution.

w(θ): observed vs corrected — all six methods

wtheta NSIDE 32
NSIDE 32
wtheta NSIDE 64
NSIDE 64
wtheta NSIDE 128
NSIDE 128
wtheta NSIDE 256
NSIDE 256

Cosmological analysis verdict

Sub-degree scales (\(\theta < 30'\)): regime is strongly systematics-dominated (\(\delta w/w \approx -7.2\%\) at 30 arcmin).

  • Without correction: not suitable without correction.

  • After correction: suitable after applying WEIGHT_COMB.

  • Large-angle warning (\(\theta > 2°\)): max correction 8.4% at 23 arcmin — any analysis using angular scales > 1° must apply WEIGHT_COMB.

LRT (NSIDE 64): \(\lambda_{\rm LR} = 1489.5\) (dof = 11), p = ≈ 0 → Reject H₀ — multiplicative contamination is statistically detected.

Recommendation: use WEIGHT_COMB (WEIGHT_SYS) for all science-grade analyses.